St. Croix County · Roads, water and land
Alterations of County Supervisory District Lines Due to Annexation a.
Seiche first signal 2025-09-30
What this means
Answers from the record.
Why now
The record consists of three resolutions covering these boundary changes, grouped together as Alterations of County Supervisory District Lines Due to Annexation a. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - City of Hudson (from the Town of Hudson) b. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - Village of Baldwin (from Town of Rush River) c. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundaries — City of New Richmond (from Town of Richmond). — show the evidence for this sentence: 2 sources
Who decides
The evidence names the resolutions themselves, Alterations of County Supervisory District Lines Due to Annexation a. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - City of Hudson (from the Town of Hudson) b. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - Village of Baldwin (from Town of Rush River) c. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundaries — City of New Richmond (from Town of Richmond), as the acting instrument, without naming any other deciding body. — show the evidence for this sentence: 2 sources
What could change, and for whom
For residents in the affected areas, no decision outcome has been recorded.
What happens next
No next public step is recorded.
These answers were drafted with AI assistance from the public record and judged claim by claim. Each sentence is bound to cited evidence or an explicit statement about what the record has not verified; open cited answers to inspect their sources. Answers without a source describe the status of the record.
Where it stands
The stages this matter has reached.
- SurfacedSeptember 30, 2025
- In committeeNot recorded
- Comment openNot recorded
- Decision scheduledSeptember 30, 2025
- DecidedNot recorded
- In effectNot recorded
What the record shows
Every record inside this matter.
Alterations of County Supervisory District Lines Due to Annexation a. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - City of Hudson (from the Town of Hudson) b. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - Village of Baldwin (from Town of Rush River) c. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundaries — City of New Richmond (from Town of Richmond)
Posted to the County Board of Supervisors agenda. No decision or next step is recorded yet.
Alterations of County Supervisory District Lines Due to Annexation a. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - City of Hudson (from the Town of Hudson) b. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundary - Village of Baldwin (from Town of Rush River) c. Resolution Approving Alteration of Supervisory District Boundaries — City of New Richmond (from Town of Richmond)
Posted to the County Board of Supervisors agenda. No decision or next step is recorded yet. Agenda item 4.
Linked automatically from the record (same identifier in the record: alterations of county supervisory district lines due to annexation a resolution approving alteration of supervisory district boundary city of hudson from the town of hudson b resolution approving alteration of supervisory district boundary village of baldwin from town of rush river c resolution approving alteration of supervisory district boundaries city of new richmond from town of richmond)
How the matter has changed
Every change, in the order it was recorded.
September 2, 2026
This matter was opened from its first record.
September 2, 2026
Another record was linked into this matter.
September 2, 2026
Stage moved from Surfaced to Decision scheduled, earned September 30, 2025.
September 2, 2026
First signal recorded as September 30, 2025.
September 3, 2026
Decision scheduled was re-dated to October 7, 2025, the date of the meeting the record describes rather than the date it was published.
September 3, 2026
Decision scheduled was re-dated to September 30, 2025, the date of the meeting the record describes rather than the date it was published.
How we know